rock pool
I have made a mistake. One that I made often when I was young. Because of my dysnomia (word retrieval problems) language doesn't come easy to me. When I was young I couldn't keep up with all the girls talking so quickly. That means I missed a lot of information. Even now I have to put the teletext underneath the TV images, otherwise I miss to much. Because talking isn't an automatic process for me it requires a lot of effort
I often don't say enough. In my writing the same, even though paper is patient.
In the past for example I got some points taken of papers at school because what I said wasn't wrong but I should have extended on things to make it more clear.
In the last two posts I got reminded again that I should expand or give an introduction so that people understand the message. I know that everybody has a different perception of things and we can't please everybody as was a conclusion on Elisabeth's blog, but I do feel a responsibility to get it right otherwise a message doesn't make sense as nobody gets it and a poem misses the point. Therefore I wrote and added 2 introductions. To late for some bloggers but if other people visit it than at least for them I made it clear.
In the last two posts I got reminded again that I should expand or give an introduction so that people understand the message. I know that everybody has a different perception of things and we can't please everybody as was a conclusion on Elisabeth's blog, but I do feel a responsibility to get it right otherwise a message doesn't make sense as nobody gets it and a poem misses the point. Therefore I wrote and added 2 introductions. To late for some bloggers but if other people visit it than at least for them I made it clear.
Makes me think if a poem misses the point is it than necessarily a bad poem?